Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 KAN 199 - Morrall v. Waterson

Morrall v. Waterson’s Empirical Analysis

1871

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
May 1920
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1920

6 state decisions

30187118801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the absence of fraud, mistake or accident, the grantor, in an absolute conveyance reciting a valuable consideration and acknowledging its receipt, and where it is admitted a valuable consideration was actually received, cannot show a parol agreement that the grantee was to hold the land conveyed in trust for his benefit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.