Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 KANAPP2D 285 - Ellis v. Darr

Ellis v. Darr’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Wilbanks v. State · 3 Kan. App. 2d 568 - Gladney v. Sheriff of Leavenworth County · Morgan v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No showing of probable cause is necessary for the extradition of one who has been convicted and sentenced for a substantive criminal offense when the demanding state alleges the person claimed has thereafter escaped from confinement, or has broken the terms of his or her bail, probation or parole. A demand for the extradition of one who has been convicted and sentenced and who thereafter escapes from confinement, or has broken the terms of his or her bail, probation or parole, must be supported by documents authenticated by the executive authority, including a copy of the judgment of conviction (or of a sentence imposed in execution thereof) and a statement that the person claimed has escaped from confinement or has broken the terms of his or her bail, probation or parole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.