Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Kan. App. 2d 369 - Lynn v. Taylor

7 Kan. App. 2d 369 - Lynn v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
10
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 district · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Kansas State Bank & Trust Co. v. Specialized Transportation Services, Inc. (1991), Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc. (1989)

3 federal appellate · 12 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 10 states

2501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Keill · Kennedy v. City of Sawyer · Henderson v. Hassur · Denison State Bank v. Madeira · Albertson v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here one party to a contract or transaction has superior knowledge, or knowledge which is not within the fair and reasonable reach of the other party and which he could not discover by the exercise of reasonable diligence, or means of knowledge which are not open to both parties alike, he is under a legal obligation to speak, and his silence constitutes fraud, especially when the other party relies upon him to communicate to him the true state of facts to enable him to judge of the expedience of the bargain.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A matter is material if it is one to which a reasonable person would attach importance in determining his choice of action in the transaction in question.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.