Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Mass. 34 - Penhallow v. Dwight

Penhallow v. Dwight’s Empirical Analysis

1810

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
8
states following
December 1931
most recently cited

1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 1931

1 district · 12 state decisions

201810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An entry, for the purpose of taking unripe corn, or other produce which would yield nothing, but in fact be wasted and destroyed, by the very act of severing it from, the soil, would not be protected by this decision.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.