Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 Md. 104

Fulton v. Nicholson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 15, 1854

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1854-12-15

Appeae from the Superior Court of Baltimore city. The record in this case shows, that a decree was passed by Baltimore county court, sitting, in equity, for the sale of certain mortgaged real estate, which had been mortgaged by Thomas H. Fulton and wife by deed of mortgage, dated the 19th of June 1847. The property was sold,- and,- by the auditor’s report, dated the 2nd of July 1852, the trustee was allowed the sum of $386.92 on account of taxes due on the property so sold.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2007

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1854-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Le Grand, C. J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of this court.

¶2We are of opinion that the taxes due the State are to be first paid out of the fund, because of the 6th and 7th sections of the act of 1S43, chapter 208; and we are also of opinion, that the taxes due to Baltimore county are also a lien, under the act of 1797, chapter 90, it being admitted that they were “duly levied.” We affirm the order so far as it allows these taxes out of the fund in this proceeding, but add thereto the declaration, that in our judgment the mortgagee will be entitled to a preference, according to his proper priority in the administration of the personal estate. We regard him as substituted to the rights of the State and county. Bank of United States vs. Peter and others, 13 Peters, 123.

¶3But for the 7th section of the act of 1843, we should say these taxes were payable first out of the personal estate. Judgments, although binding real estate, are given a preference over other claims against the personal assets, and we think the same principle applies to taxes. They have always been allowed as preferred claims against the personalty. But by the 7th section, it is made the duty of the trustee to pay the taxes out of the proceeds. When this is done, the party entitled to the fund may be substituted in place of the collector or other party, to whom the taxes may be paid.

¶4Order affirmed

/7/md/104 · .json · Public domain