7 Md. App. 505 - Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently February 2001 · most notably State v. Brown (1979), 11 Md. App. 508 - Folk v. State (1971)
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 67 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Chapman v. State of California · Katz v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Carroll v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The criteria guiding resolution of the question implicate (a) the purpose to be served by the new standards, (b) the extent of the reliance by law enforcement authorities on the old standards, and (c) on the effect of the administration of justice of a retroactive application of the new standards.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““9. Our holding today is of course entirely consistent with the recognized principle that, assuming the existence of probable cause, automobiles and other vehicles may be searched without warrants ‘where it is not practicable to secure a warrant, because the vehicle can he quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought.’ Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 153 , 45 S.Ct. 280, 285 , 69 L.Ed. 543 ; see Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The police have the right to conduct a contemporaneous search of the arrestee’s person for weapons, fruits or instrumentalities of the crime or, ‘mere evidence,’ incident to a lawful arrest.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.