7 Md. App. 89 - Davenport v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Virgil D. Dardi, Robert B. Gravis, Charles Rosenthal and Charles Berman · 2 Md. App. 80 - Boone v. State · Johnson v. State · 5 Md. App. 571 - Boswell v. State · Pressley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * Some conflict of interest must be shown before it can be claimed that representation by an attorney also engaged by another defendant deprived him of his right to the effective assistance of counsel. * * *” Davenport v. State, 7 Md. App. 89, 96 , 253 A. 2d 768 (1969).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““To show prejudice there must be revealed an actual or imminently potential conflict of interest which prevented the lawyer from impartially and adequately representing his clients.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.