Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 Mich. 9

Sanger v. Truesdail

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1859

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1859-07-12

Question reserved from • St. Clair Circuit in Chancery. Defendant had interposed a plea to the hill of complaint, and the Circuit Judge reserved, for the opinion of this court, the'question whether the matters pleaded constituted in law a bar to the bill of complaint.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1905

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-07-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By The Court:

¶1.It is conceded here, on both sides, that the plea is bad. This is the only question on which the court below has asked of us our opinion; and when this is disposed of, any further advice we might give the court below would *10be quite outside the record, an argument in the case.*

¶2We will not, therefore, hear

¶3In the caso of The Michigan Southern and Northern Indiana Railroad Co. v. Danis, which camo oil for hearing at the May Term, 1859, counsel for defendant in error, on the cause being called, conceded that thoro were some errors in the record, and that the judgment must be reversed. Nmmons, for plaintiff in error desired to be heard on other points, which he thought ought to be passed upon by the court, but the court declined to hear the argument.

/7/mich/9 · .json · Public domain