Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 MISS 406 - Foster v. Alston

Foster v. Alston’s Empirical Analysis

1842

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2009

7 state decisions

4018421850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law has given to our courts the most unbounded jurisdiction over minors. Fathers may be preferred to mothers — mothers to fathers — relatives to parents — or strangers to either, for the custody and care of minors, where the interests of the child require its exercise. Rev.Code, p. 64, 401, c. ( 7 Miss. at 457 )”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.