¶1Opinion of the Court, delivered by
¶2This was an action of assumpsit brought by Allsman against the plaintiffs in error, on a written contract to build two boats of a particular description. The declaration contained counts on the special agreement, and a common count for work and labor, &e. On the trial, Allsman obtained a verdict and judgment.
¶3The testimony in support of the special counts was contradictory; and evidence was given, conducing to show that the plaintiffs in error accepted the boats after they were built.
¶4The court instructed the jury, that if they believed from the evidence, that the plaintiffs built the boats, and they were afterwards accepted by the defendants, they must find for the plaintiffs the value of the boats.
¶5It is clear,, that if the boats were not built according to contract, the plaintiffs in error were under no obligation to accept them, unless they had done some act, from which it might be inferred they waived a compliance with the contract, or unless, they with a full knowledge acquiesced in a deviation from it. If, however, the boats were not built according to contract, and there was no waiver of a compliance with it; yet if they were after-wards accepted, the builder was entitled to recover their value.
¶6Admitting the special contract was not complied yet under the common count, the defendant in error was entitled to a verdict. There was no error in the instruction of the court, and the jury whose exclusive province it was to ascertain the weight of the evidence, and determine the credibility of the witnesses, having found a verdict for the defendant in error, there is nothing preserved in the bill of exceptions which would warrant us in disturbing it.
¶7Judgment affirmed.