Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 N.C. 216

State v. . Williamson

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1819-05-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1804

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1819-05-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The Bank note offered in evidence upon the trial of the indictment, was in the following words and figures, to-wit:

¶2No. 413. D. 4

¶3The President and Directors of the Bank of New Bern, promise . to pay G. Curry, or bearer, on demand, four Dollars. D New Bern, 6 Nov., 1809. R U FOUR. O F M. C. STEPHENS, Cash'r. JAS. M'KINLAY, Pres.

¶4On behalf of the Defendant, it was insisted, that as the (217) indictment charged him with feloniously stealing, taking, *167 and carrying away, a Bank note "issued by the Bank of New Bern," and the note offered in evidence, purported to be issued by "the President and Directors of the Bank of New Bern," the evidence did not support the charge; and of this opinion was the Court, and the Defendant was acquitted.

¶5At September Term, 1817, the Defendant was indicted "for feloniously stealing, taking, and carrying away, a certain Bank note, issued by the President and Directors of the Bank of New Bern, of the Number 413, letter D, dated New Bern, 6 November, 1809, subscribed with the name of James M'Kinlay, Pres't," c., pursuing the description as given in the preceding indictment.

¶6To this indictment the Defendant pleaded "former acquittal," and the Solicitor for the State replied "nul tiel record." And the record of the first indictment, and the proceedings had thereon, was offered in support of the plea. The Court was of the opinion, that the record produced did not support the plea, and the Defendant appealed. The record produced does not support the plea. Let the plea be overruled. (218)

/7/nc/216 · .json · Public domain