Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 NCAPP 160 - State v. McPherson

State v. McPherson’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · State v. Williams · State v. Carter · State v. Primes · State v. Poolos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ [s] uch finding must be based on clear and convincing evidence. United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 1149 ; State v. Stamey, 3 N.C. App. 200 , 164 S.E. 2d 547 . [But] [w]here the evidence, as here, shows that the witness had a good and sufficient opportunity to observe a defendant at the time the offense was being committed, and testifies that his in-court identification is based on his observation made at that time, the test of ‘clear and convincing evidence’ is met and will support findings such as were made by the court in this case. State v. Stamey, 6 N.C. App. 517 , 170 S.E. 2d 497 . See also State v. Gatling, 275 N.C. 625 , 170 S.E. 2d 593 ; State v. Primes, 275 N.C. 61 , 165 S.E. 2d 225 ; State v. Williams, 274 N.C. 328 , 163 S.E. 2d 353 . ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.