Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 N.C. App. 388

State v. Rhoades

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1970

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1970-02-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1970

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Lewis · In Re Steele · In Re Renfrow

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1970-02-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BROCK, J.

¶1This is an attempted appeal from an order entered at the conclusion of a habeas corpus hearing to inquire into the legality of defendant’s restraint under extradition proceedings instituted by the State of Texas.

¶2“Except in cases involving the custody of minor children, G.S. 17-40 [repealed in 1967 but reprovided by G.S. 50-13.5 (b) (2) ], no appeal lies from a judgment rendered on return to a writ of habeas corpus. In re Steele, 220 N.C. 685, 687, 18 S.E. 2d 132, 134, and cases cited; In re Renfrow, supra[247 N.C. 55, 59, 100 S.E. 2d 315, 317]. The remedy, if any, is by petition for writ of certiorari, addressed to the sound discretion of the appellate court. In re Lee Croom, 175 N.C. 455, 95 S.E. 903.” State v. Lewis, 274 N.C. 438, 441, 164 S.E. 2d 177. See also, In re Palmer, 265 N.C. 485, 144 S.E. 2d 413; State v. Burnette, 173 N.C. 734, 739, 91 S.E. 364; In re Wilson, 3 N.C. App. 136, 164 S.E. 2d 56; State v. Green, 2 N.C. App. 391, 163 S.E. 2d 14; 2 McIntosh, N.C. Practice 2d, § 2464(9). The same rule applies to hearings on return to writs of habeas corpus in extradition proceedings. In re Malicord, 211 N.C. 684, 191 S.E. 730; In re Guerin, 206 N.C. 824, 175 S.E. 181; In re Bailey, 203 N.C. 362, 166 S.E. 165; In re Hubbard, 201 N.C. 472, 160 S.E. 569.

¶3As an attempted appeal, the same must be dismissed. However, we have considered the record and brief as a petition for writ of certiorari, and, after reviewing the record, we deny the same.

¶4Appeal dismissed.

¶5Petition denied.

Britt and Graham, JJ., concur.
/7/ncapp/388 · .json · Public domain