State v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Based on the above case law [referencing Cuyler v. Adams, 449 U.S. 433 , 101 S. Ct. 703 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 641 (1981); Michigan v. Doran, supra; and Radant v. Vargason, 220 Neb. 116 , 368 N.W.2d 483 (1985)], a prisoner whose transfer is sought by a receiving state under the Agreement [on Detainers] may challenge through a petition for writ of habeas corpus whether the documents on their face are in order, whether the petitioner has been charged with a crime in the receiving state, and whether he or she is the person named in the request for temporary custody. A challenge to one’s fugitive status is not applicable to a challenge to a detainer because the challenger is incarcerated.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 10 Neb. Ct. App. 416 - State v. Champ