Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 NEV 163 - McNabb v. Wixom

McNabb v. Wixom’s Empirical Analysis

1871

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
June 1931
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1931

5 state decisions

201871188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. Chase · Kellogg v. Brennan · Irwin v. Backus · Pico v. Webster · Hurlburt v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We quite agree that an administrator is bound to the exercise of care and diligence, such as prudent and judicious men ordinarily bestow upon their own important affairs; that it is his duty to settle and distribute the estate with as little delay as practicable; and that whenever he does what the law prohibits, or fails to exercise reasonable care and diligence in the endeavor to do what the law enjoins, he and' his sureties are liable for the damage consequent upon such act or omission.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.