Morse v. Bellows’s Empirical Analysis
1835
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 1990 · most notably 512 So. 2d 725 - Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Campbell (1987), Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Co. (1920)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crocker v. Whitney · Thompson v. Ketcham · Lent v. Padelford · Moies v. Bird · Freeman v. Boynton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. “Nor' is it necessary that the consideration should exist at the time of making the promise; for if the person to whom a promise is made should incur any" loss, expense, or liability in consequence of the promise, and relying ftpon' it, the promise, thereupon becomes obligatory. ' Thus, if A. promise B. to-pay him-a-'suíh'Of'rhoney-fif-he Will do a particular act, and- B. does the act, the promise thereupon becomes binding, although B. at the time of the promise does-not engage to do the act. In the intermediate time the' obligation of the contract or promise is suspended; for until the performance of the condition of the promise there is no consideration, and the promise is nudum pactum, but on the performance of the condition by the promisee it is clothed with a valid consideration, which relates back to the promise, and it then becomes obligatory.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.