Karandontes v. Ferrell’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The legislature intended that the `description identifying or tending to identify such defendant' should serve the quite obvious purpose of identifying the defendant so that any reasonably intelligent person might know who was intended. [at 808]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.