Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 NM 405 - Clancey v. Clancey

Clancey v. Clancey’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
March 1931
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1931

5 state decisions

2018941900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ferris v. Higley · State v. Steinmetz · Lewis v. Baca · Spiegelberg v. Mink

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It shall be the duty of the probate judge to hear and determine claims against the estate. All such claims shall be stated in detail, sworn to and filed. ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.