Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 N.Y.S. 900

Clark v. Lichtenberg

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 31, 1889

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1889-10-31

Action by Lizzie H. Clark against Moses J. Lichtenberg and others. An. order was entered allowing plaintiff to amend her complaint on terms, from which defendants appeal.

Relies on Brown v. . Leigh

Decided 1889-10-31

Per Curiam.

¶1The court may, before trial, in furtherance of justice, permit a plaintiff to amend his complaint by abandoning the cause of action alleged, and including in the amended pleading one or more causes of action of a different class, subject only to the restriction that they all belong to the same-class, and are narrated by the summons. Brown v. Leigh, 49 N. Y. 78. The plaintiff herein obtained leave to withdraw the cause of action on what is-called the “first” undertaking on appeal, and to continue it on what is denominated the “second.” undertaking on appeal. Both causes of action were on contract; were given to secure the same judgment; and the parties thereto-were the same on each obligation. The court had power to grant the amendment; and, as the discretion was not abused, the order appealed from must be affirmed. As the terms imposed as a condition, $15, were light, the affirmance will be without costs.

/7/nys/900 · .json · Public domain