Lane v. Jacobs

¶1After a re-examination of this case, we are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by us on the previous argument should not be dis*955turbed. It does not appear that any substantial fact has been disregarded, or any point of law overlooked; and, adhering to the rule expressed in Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283, we think this application should be denied.