Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Ohio App. 3d 17 - State v. Norman

7 Ohio App. 3d 17 - State v. Norman’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2025

14 state decisions

6019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Long · State v. Bridgeman · State v. Wolery · State v. Thomas · State v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Crim.R. 16 allows a court to prohibit the introduction into evidence of the testimony of a witness who had not been disclosed to the other side prior to the time of trial where there is a continuing order for discovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.