7 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2004
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pudlock · 42 Ohio App. 2d 41 - State v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Having found no cases which provide us with any guidelines as to the reasonableness of the time utilized by the trial court to respond to * * * [a motion for discharge], we find this to be a ‘judgment call] on our part. With this in mind, after taking into consideration the day to day demands upon the trial judges and after taking into consideration the fact that the schedule of a trial judge is to a great extent set well in advance of any given date, we find that the twenty-one day time period was reasonable.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“his mental competency to stand trial is being determined ***.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Fetzer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.