Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Ohio App. 3d 258 - State v. Harris

7 Ohio App. 3d 258 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Pepper Pike v. Doe · Barker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not recognized by law or the rules of procedure. {¶ 23} Finally, I would reverse the trial court's expungement of Minch's theft in office conviction because Minch cannot satisfy the fourth requirement under R.C. 2953.32 (C).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Expungement of a conviction of theft in office can never be `consistent with the public interest.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “all rights and privileges not otherwise restored,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.