7 Ohio App. 3d 32 - Nickey v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

79 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “is a severe sanction and should be invoked only when clearly necessary to enforce willful noncompliance or to prevent unfair surprise.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Orwick v. Orwick, Unpublished Decision (9-21-2005) · Paul C. Harger Trust v. Morrow Cty. Reg. Plan. Comm., 07 Ca 6 (1-5-2009)

2. ““Rebutting evidence is that which is given to explain, repel, counteract, or disprove facts given in evidence by the adverse party. It is that evidence which has become relevant or important only as an effect of some evidence introduced by the other side.””

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 122 Ohio App. 3d 720 - Weimer v. Anzevino · 62 Ohio App. 3d 206 - Tritt v. Judd's Moving & Storage, Inc.

3. ““Errors and irregularities in the manner in which the testimony is transcribed or the deposition is prepared, signed, certified, sealed, indorsed, transmitted, filed, or otherwise dealt with by the officer under Rule 30 and Rule 31 are waived unless a motion to suppress the deposition or some part thereof is made with reasonable promptness after such defect is, or with due diligence might have been, ascertained.” (Emphasis added.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rigby v. Lake County