7 Or. App. 236 - State v. Trujillo’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The majority view as stated in an ALR Annotation is that the intent to collect or secure a debt, if under a bona fide belief that the taker is entitled to possession of the property, negates the requisite "animus furandi." The few cases holding contrary are unpersuasive. In adopting the majority view, we note in particular the qualification that the defense is not available when more than is believed due is taken. ( 489 P.2d at 979 ).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 317 So. 2d 425 - Williams v. State

2. “On the first trip, about noon, he argued twenty minutes with the cashier, but left and was told that the manager would be in at 1:00. When he returned at 1:00 the manager had not arrived. Further argument with the cashier ensued. The cashier promised to ask the manager about defendant's money. When the manager returned she left again without taking any action as to Trujillo's wages. On his final return, Trujillo”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 317 So. 2d 425 - Williams v. State

3. “From the evidence related above we think that a reasonable inference can be drawn from evidence properly before the court that defendant took more than the sum due him, and that he had no intention of limiting himself to such sum as he took the money during the robbery. ( 489 P.2d at 980 ).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 317 So. 2d 425 - Williams v. State