7 Or. App. 566 - State v. Vance’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “" [T]he officers had good reason to believe that delaying their entry would increase their peril because of the above mentioned handgun. [T]his is sufficient to require reversal, * * *. "* * * * * "The actions of the person who observed the officers approaching the door, coupled with the information which the officers had that the subject of the search warrant was armed, provided exigent circumstances excusing the officers' noncompliance with ORS 133.290 [the predecessor codification of ORS 133.235]." (Emphasis added.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ford

2. “* * * * * "The actions of the person who observed the officers approaching the door, coupled with the information which the officers had that the subject of the search warrant was armed, provided exigent circumstances excusing the officers' noncompliance with ORS 133.290 [the predecessor codification of ORS 133.235].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ford