People v. Tally’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2012
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Davis v. United States · Wainwright v. Greenfield · Riggins v. Nevada
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he very nature of [the] statement suggested that [Tally] was fully capable of understanding the proceeding and acting intelligently with respect to the advisement he had been given. [Tally’s] recognition that, if he had not been on medication, his reaction to the Curtis advisement might have been different did not suggest, in any way, that he was not then competent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a defendant's right against self-incrimination is not implicated when testimony is admitted only for the purpose of establishing [the] defendant's sanity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Grant“[a] defendant's sanity is not an element of the offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Grant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.