Cook v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2026
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Tome v. United States · Vaughn v. State · Scadden v. State · Bloomquist v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determine whether the trial court could reasonably conclude as it did and whether any facet of its ruling was arbitrary or capricious.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. State · Wilkening v. State“[the declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is ... (B) consistent with his testimony and is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against him of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Maier v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.