Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 P.3d 835 - State v. Ewing

State v. Ewing’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · State v. Larsen · 99 Wash. 2d 75 - State v. Barr · 78 Wash. App. 870 - State v. Martinez · 97 Wash. App. 161 - State v. Edelman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any person who has sustained emotional, psychological, physical, or financial injury to person or property as a direct result of the crime charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “unable to discern why civil doctrines ... have any place in interpretation of criminal statutes”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “of attorney fees,] designed to regulate recovery of attorney fees in civil cases[,] has any application in deciding an award of restitution in a criminal proceeding”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.