State v. Ogden’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 126 Wash. 2d 388 - State v. Ritchie · 72 Wash. App. 207 - State v. Scott · 71 Wash. App. 556 - State v. Ross · State v. Nuttall · Patrice v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant knew or should have known that the victim of the current offense was particularly vulnerable or incapable of resistance due to extreme youth, advanced age, disability, or ill health.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barnett“[a] crime is heinous, cruel, and depraved only if the heinousness, cruelty and depravity of the particular crime go `beyond what could be said to be part of any act of [that type of crime].'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. EAJ“is on the conduct of the juvenile rather than exclusively on the pain and suffering of the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. EAJ
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.