Stone v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Broyles v. Broyles · Hamburg v. Heilbrun · Sharpe v. Sharpe · Amen, Inc. v. Barnard · Stone v. Stone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only in those rare circumstances where an appeal lacks cogent argument, where there is an absence of pertinent authority to support the claims of error, and/or when there is a failure to adequately cite to the record.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Deede v. Deede · Shores v. Bucklin“[Wle expect pro se litigants to comply with the Wyoming rules of appellate procedure in the same way that trained lawyers are expected to perform. While we may make allowances for pro se litigants, they are not excused from the requirement that their brief be supported by cogent argument and citations to pertinent authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.