Baumgartner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vernier v. State · Derksen v. State · Stewart v. State · Grable v. State · Esquibel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In order to obtain a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, a defendant must establish each of the following factors: 1) he did not become aware of the new evidence until after the trial; 2) it was not because of lack of due diligence that the new evidence did not come to light sooner; 3) the evidence is so material that it would probably produce a different result; and 4) the evidence is not cumulative.... If a defendant fails to prove any of these factors, the motion is properly denied."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State · Cross v. State“A motion for a new trial based on the grounds of newly discovered evidence may be made only before or within two years after final judgment but if an appeal is pending, the court may grant the motion only on remand of the case. A motion for new trial based on the ground of newly discovered evidence shall be heard and determined and a dispositive order entered within 30 days after the motion is filed unless, within that time, the determination is continued by order of the court, but no continuances shall extend the time to a day more than 60 days from the date that the original motion was filed. When disposition of a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence is made without hearing, the order shall include a statement of the reason for determination without hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. State“plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Heywood v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.