7 Smith & H. 109 - Roberts v. Roane County’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably State Ex Rel. Lawrence County v. Hobbs (1952), Bricker v. Sims (1953)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The authorities cited do not question the general rule, that an unconstitutional statute is not a law, does not of itself confer any rights, duties or obligations, and is `in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.' ... But it is recognized that parties may so deal with each other upon the faith of such a statute that neither may invoke the aid of the courts to undo what they themselves have done."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“. Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 6 S.Ct. 1121, 1125 , 30 L.Ed. 178 . But it is recognized that parties may so deal with each other upon the faith of such a statute that neither may invoke the aid of the courts to undo what they themselves have done.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“But by this language the court could only have meant that the third class of counties created by the general act might be divided and a salary provided for the officers in the smaller counties, by a reasonable, but not arbitrary, classification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.