Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Smith & H. 285 - State Ex Rel. Guy v. Foster

7 Smith & H. 285 - State Ex Rel. Guy v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 1975
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1975

9 state decisions

5019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Christopher Strassheim v. Milton Daily · Hogan v. O'Neill · Vanvabry v. Staton · 4 Smith & H. 641 - State Ex Rel. Redwine v. Selman · Anderson County v. Hays

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Such remandment must be based upon the record alone, and not upon matter outside of the record, such as affidavits, etc., for the remandment upon matter outside of the record would require the exercise of original and not appellate jurisdiction.” (cases cited)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.