Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 SO3D 190 - McLeod v. Moore

McLeod v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co. · Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. U.S. Bank N.A. · Gully v. New York Commissioner of Labor · 679 So. 2d 477 - NAB Nat. Resources v. Willamette Industries, Inc. · Tower Credit, Inc. v. Carpenter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) there is a valid contract between the parties; (2) the work being done is of an independent nature such that the contractor may employ non-exclusive means in accomplishing it; (3) the contract calls for specific piecework as a unit to be done according to the independent contractor’s own methods, without being subject to the control and direction of the principal, except as to the result of the services to be rendered; (4) there is a specific price for the overall undertaking agreed upon; and (5) the duration of the work is for a specific time and not subject to and not subject to termination or discontinuance at the will of either side without a corresponding liability for its breach.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) who has the right of control over the employee beyond the mere suggestion of details or cooperation; (2) who selected the employee; (3) who paid the employee's wages; (4) who had the right to fire the employee; (5) who furnished the tools and the place to perform the work; (6) was the new employment over a considerable length of time; (7) whose work was being done at the time of the accident; (8) was there an agreement between the borrowing and lending employers; (9) did the employee acquiesce in the new work situation; and (10) did the original employer terminate his relationship with or relinquish his control over the employee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In deciding whether a borrowed employee relationship exists, the following factors are important to consider in making such a determination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.