Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 So. 3d 564

Edelstein v. BEAGELL

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 2009

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-02-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on 899 So. 2d 1272 - Dempsey v. Dempsey · Sanchez v. Masterhan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of December 11, 2008, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, entitled “Final Order on Petition for Determination of Beneficiaries,” denied the petition below without making any final determination as to the beneficiaries of the estate. Therefore, the order on appeal did not “finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person,” so as to be appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2). See Dempsey v. Dempsey, 899 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

¶2 The appellee’s “Motion to Dismiss and/or Require Appellant to Properly Designate the Record on Appeal,” filed on January 15, 2008, as well as the “Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Initial Brief,” filed on January 29, 2009, are denied as moot.

¶3 DISMISSED.

WEBSTER, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
/7/so3d/564 · .json · Public domain