¶1 We affirm the order revoking Viera’s probation for new law violations, a violation of condition K-4 of his order of probation. On the State’s concession of error, however, we remand so that unproven technical probation violations can be deleted from the written sentence. The oral pronouncement correctly states the trial court’s ruling. The defendant’s presence is not required for this ministerial correction.
¶2 Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected revocation order.