¶1 Upon further review of the jurisdictional questions promulgated by this Court to the parties sua sponte in this case, we treat the appeal in this case as one taken from nonfinal orders which determine the right to immediate possession of property under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii). See Greene v. Borsky, 961 So.2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (stating that a sum of money is property to which Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) applies). We affirm the orders under review.
7 So. 3d 598
Malek v. Bright
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 25, 2009
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-03-25
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2019
4 state decisions
Relies on Brown v. Woodard
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2009-03-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →