Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 S.W.3d 30 - Solima v. Solima

Solima v. Solima’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Taylor · Aaby v. Strange · Varley v. Varley · Young v. Smith · Dantzler v. Dantzler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"There are no hard and fast rules for determining when a child's circumstances have changed sufficiently to warrant a change of his or her custody." Nevertheless, the following factors have formed a sound basis to determine whether such a change has occurred: the change has occurred after the entry of the order sought to be modified and the change is not one that was known or reasonably anticipated when the order was entered, and the change is one that affects the child's well-being in a meaningful way.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “have changed materially in a way that could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the original custody decision”); Adelsperger v. Adelsperger, 970 S.W.2d 482, 485 (Tenn.Ct.App.1997) (describing the standard as whether”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.