Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 S.W.3d 549

State v. Haupt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1999

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1999-11-28

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2018

23 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-11-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Donald Haupt appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of attempted forcible sodomy in violation of Sections 566.060 and 564.011 RSMo. (1994) and one count of third degree assault in violation of Section 565.070 RSMo. (1994). He was sentenced to 21 years’ incarceration.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/7/sw3d/549 · .json · Public domain