Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 U.S. 267 - Strawbridge v. Curtiss

Strawbridge v. Curtiss’s Empirical Analysis

1806

Citation profile

1,594
cited by 1,594 later decisions
39
cited 39 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

280 federal appellate · 328 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,594 later decisions (39 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger (1978), Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co. (1959)

280 federal appellate · 328 district · 14 state decisions

370018061810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Cited together with Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · City of Indianapolis v. Chase Nat Bank of City of New York · Carden v. Arkoma Associates · Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,594 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued, in the federal courts.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The words of the act of Congress are, 'where an alien is a party; or the suit is between a citizen of a state where the suit is brought, and a citizen of another state.' The court understands these expressions to mean, that each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued, in the federal courts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.