¶1This is a suit for money had and received by the defendants to the use of the plaintiff. Trial by court, jury waived. Bindings and judgment for the plaintiff. Motion for new trial. Motion overruled, and appeal from the order overruling' motion for new trial and judgment. There is no question of law that needs com-ment in this case. After careful examination, we think. *412the evidence clearly and fully supports the findings of the court, and justifies the judgment. A review of the evidence would be wholly without profit. Therefore the judgment is affirmed.
7 Utah 410
Smyth v. Lawson
Decided June 15, 1891
Utah Supreme Court · decided 1891-06-15
The findings of the trial court were as follows: That on the second day of November, 1889, the plaintiff and J. L. .Lawson defendant, and Peter Brixen owned the premises described in plaintiff’s complaint, each an undivided one-third interest, and that on the same day the plaintiff employed defendants to act as his agents in the sale of his interest in. said property, and that defendants accepted said employment.
Decided 1891-06-15