7 Va. App. 148 - Trivett v. Trivett’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 547
Relies on McGrath v. Kristensen · 3 Va. App. 337 - Woolley v. Woolley · 2 Va. App. 508 - Hodges v. Hodges · 4 Va. App. 397 - Wagner v. Wagner · 5 Va. App. 132 - Brinkley v. Brinkley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We will not simply assume, in every instance, that the trial court has followed this settled law in granting a monetary award, particularly when it appears that one or more factors is difficult to reconcile with the award or the award is inexplicable based on the facts, when we are required to review on appeal an issue arising under [Code § 20-107.3]. We must be able to determine from the record that the trial court has given substantive consideration to the evidence as it relates to the provisions of this Code section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.