Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Va. App. 472 - Holmes v. Holmes

7 Va. App. 472 - Holmes v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
8
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Danielson v. Evans (2001), Thomas C. Shooltz v. Jane Hoffman Shooltz (1998)

44 state decisions

2001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1401 (Military Retirement Reform Act of 1986) · 10 U.S.C. § 1408 · 38 U.S.C. § 310

Relies on Rose v. Rose · 1 Va. App. 118 - Parra v. Parra · 5 Va. App. 238 - Brown v. Brown · 1 Va. App. 385 - Rexrode v. Rexrode · Morris v. Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he source of payments need not come from his exempt disability pay; the husband is free to satisfy his obligations to his former wife by using other available assets.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “bald assertions,” it was “unnecessary to address ... arguments that certain exempt disability funds retain their exempt status after being deposited in accounts and that these funds need not be maintained separately and distinctly from marital funds because we conclude that the husband did not carry his burden in establishing that the sources of his bank account funds were his disability pay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “provisions made with regard to the marital property under § 20-107.3,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.