Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Va. App. 642 - Gosling v. Commonwealth

7 Va. App. 642 - Gosling v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2017

20 state decisions

1101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Justus v. Commonwealth · Breeden v. Commonwealth · 3 Va. App. 564 - Mullis v. Commonwealth · Salina v. Commonwealth · Parsons v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t] he right to a trial by an impartial jury is guaranteed under both the United States and Virginia Constitutions. This guarantee is reinforced by legislative enactment and by the rules of court. It is the trial judge’s duty to secure an impartial jury for the parties. Resolution of the question of a juror’s impartiality depends upon the facts and circumstances of each particular case. At a minimum, however, the law re quires that the juror “stand indifferent in the cause.” Any reasonable doubt regarding the prospective juror’s ability to give the accused a fair and impartial trial must be resolved in favor of the accused.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A [prospective] juror's subsequent statement that he can give the defendant a fair and impartial trial ... is not dispositive when preceded by positive, unequivocal testimony of bias.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.