Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Va. App. 93 - Iglesias v. Commonwealth

7 Va. App. 93 - Iglesias v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably 25 Va. App. 193 - McGee v. Commonwealth (1997), 9 Va. App. 139 - Murphy v. Commonwealth (1989)

82 state decisions

4101988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he purpose of the Fourth Amendment is not to eliminate all contact between the police and the citizenry, but “to prevent arbitrary and oppressive interference by enforcement officials with the privacy and personal security of individuals.” As long as the person to whom questions are put remains free to disregard the questions and walk away, there has been no intrusion upon that person’s liberty or privacy as would under the Constitution require some particularized and objective justification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “First, there are communications between police officers and citizens that are consensual and, therefore, do not implicate the Fourth Amendment. Second, there are brief investigatory stops which must be based on specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant a limited intrusion. Third, there are highly intrusive full-scale arrests, which must be based on probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.