Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 Vet. App. 126

Hesse v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · decided 1994-10-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2007

Relies on Vda de Landicho v. Brown · Zevalkink v. Brown

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-10-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On October 13, 1994, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the stay in this *127ease be lifted and asking that judgment be entered against the appellant as the appellant concedes would be required under the decisions of the Court in Zevalkink v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 483 (1994), and Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994) (consolidated with Oseo v. Brown, No. 92-90).

¶3On consideration of the foregoing, it is

¶4ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. It is further

¶5ORDERED that judgment will be entered on the date of this order. Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, this order constitutes the mandate of this Court.

/7/vetapp/126 · .json · Public domain