Scott v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 5110 · 38 U.S.C. § 7104 · 38 U.S.C. § 7105 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Service v. Dulles · Gilbert v. Derwinski · Russell v. Principi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he exercise of such a discretionary [extension] authority as to which regulations have been prescribed is subject to review by this Court to determine whether the exercise of discretion was made ‘in accordance with the regulatory guidance or whether the decision was made in an arbitrary or capricious manner'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.