Martin v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2015
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 38 U.S.C. § 1311 · 38 U.S.C. § 1503 · 38 U.S.C. § 1521 · 38 U.S.C. § 1541 · 38 U.S.C. § 5121 · 38 U.S.C. § 5312 · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on King v. St. Vincent's Hospital · Smith v. Brown · Zevalkink v. Brown · Cole v. Derwinski · Cole v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]tatute and VA regulations provide that 'annual income', as defined by statute and applicable regulation, includes payments of any kind from any source, unless explicitly exempted by statute or regulation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.