Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 VETAPP 36 - Gabrielson v. Brown

Gabrielson v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Caluza v. Brown (1995), Allday v. Brown (1995)

570199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 105 · 38 U.S.C. § 1110 · 38 U.S.C. § 1310 · 38 U.S.C. § 5107 · 38 U.S.C. § 7104 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261

Relies on Gilbert v. Derwinski · Fletcher v. Derwinski · Quarles v. Derwinski · Hatlestad v. Derwinski · Moore v. Derwinski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Board must identify those findings it deems crucial to its decisions and account for the evidence which it finds to be persuasive or unpersuasive. These decisions must contain clear analysis and succinct but complete explanations. A bare conclu-sory statement, without both supporting analysis and explanation, is neither helpful to the veteran, nor “clear enough to permit effective judicial review ”, nor in compliance with statutory requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “cannot evade [its] statutory responsibility merely by adopting [a medical examiner's] opinion as its own, where . . . the [examiner's] opinion fails to discuss all the evidence which appears to support appellant's position”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.